Write an essay plan from the question
Paste your essay question, word count and marking criteria. Get a thesis, a paragraph-by-paragraph plan and the evidence to find. You write it.
How to use it
- Paste the exact question Word for word, plus the word count. Attach the marking rubric and readings if you have them.
- Check the question breakdown The plan starts by unpacking the task words (discuss, evaluate, compare). Make sure it matches what your tutor asked for.
- Find the evidence Each paragraph lists the kind of source to find. Use your unit readings and library database, not the chat, for sources.
- Write it yourself Use the plan as scaffolding. Your uni's academic integrity rules apply to how you use any AI help.
The prompt
You are a university learning adviser. Help me plan an essay. Do not write the essay or any full paragraphs of it — give me a plan I will write from myself.
Essay question: [ESSAY_QUESTION]
Word count: [WORD_COUNT]
Course, level and marking criteria (or use the attached rubric): [COURSE_AND_CRITERIA_DETAILS]
My initial ideas or position, if any: [MY_IDEAS_NOTES]
Return:
- Unpacking the question: the task words (discuss, evaluate, compare…) and what they require, the key terms to define, and the scope (what is in and out).
- Possible thesis statements: two or three different positions in one sentence each; recommend one and say why.
- Paragraph plan: introduction, body paragraphs and conclusion, each with its main point as a topic idea (not a finished sentence), the evidence or type of source needed, a possible counter-argument where relevant, and a word budget that adds up to the word count (about 10% each for introduction and conclusion).
- Evidence to find: the kinds of sources to look for and search terms for the library database. Do not invent specific references, authors or statistics.
- Check against the criteria: how the plan meets each marking criterion.Remind me to check my university's rules on using AI tools for assessments.
Example result
1. Unpacking the question
- "To what extent" — you need a position on a scale, not yes/no. Show where public transport should come first and where roads still matter.
- "Prioritise" — about funding and planning decisions, not banning roads. Define it in your introduction.
- "Discuss with reference to at least one Australian city" — one city in depth (Melbourne) is safer at 1,500 words than three in passing.
- Out of scope: detailed engineering, cities outside Australia (except briefly as comparison).
2. Possible thesis statements
- Australian cities should prioritise public transport in established inner and middle areas, while targeted road investment remains justified for freight and growth-area links. (Recommended: a clear "to what extent" answer that a marker can follow.)
- Australian cities should prioritise public transport almost entirely, because new roads induce traffic.
- Neither should be prioritised; land-use planning matters more than transport mode.
3. Paragraph plan (1,500 words)
| Part | Main idea | Evidence to find | Words |
|---|---|---|---|
| Introduction | Context: population growth and congestion in Melbourne; define "prioritise"; state thesis | One figure on Melbourne's projected population | 150 |
| Body 1 | Public transport moves more people per lane and per dollar in dense corridors | Comparison of corridor capacity; Metro Tunnel business case | 300 |
| Body 2 | New roads tend to fill up again (induced demand) | A peer-reviewed study or review of induced demand | 300 |
| Body 3 | Counter-argument: freight and outer suburbs still rely on roads | West Gate Tunnel purpose (freight, trucks off local streets); outer-suburb car dependence data | 300 |
| Body 4 | So the answer depends on place: a mixed approach weighted towards public transport | Victorian or federal infrastructure strategy | 300 |
| Conclusion | Restate the position and its limits; one implication | — | 150 |
4. Evidence to find
- Government sources: Infrastructure Victoria's strategy, the Metro Tunnel and West Gate Tunnel business cases.
- Academic: search your library database for "induced demand" AND motorway, public transport investment Australia, transport equity outer suburbs.
- Data: ABS Census journey-to-work for Melbourne.
5. Check against the criteria
- Argument (30%) — one clear, qualified thesis carried through every paragraph.
- Evidence (30%) — at least one source per body paragraph, with government and academic types.
- Structure (20%) — one idea per paragraph; counter-argument handled in Body 3.
- Referencing (20%) — use the style your unit guide names.
Check your university's policy on using AI in assessments; many allow planning help but require you to say so.